Re: Linux 2.2.13ac1 - clarification

Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Fri, 22 Oct 1999 10:52:45 +0100 (GMT)


On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

> Before everyone goes "but you said knfsd.." the reason that its tagged
> in my list under not going into the main kernel is that the merged
> knfsd is 0.4.x and the current knfsd thats planned for merging is
> 0.5.x.

Do you really mean it that way round? 0.5 is experimental (and rather
borked) whereas 0.4.7 is actually quite useful.

Or are you waiting for 0.5 to stabilise?

Or am I just too slow this morning to parse that sentence correctly?

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/