Re: 2.3.23 bug: /proc/meminfo

Martin Dalecki (dalecki@cs.net.pl)
Sun, 24 Oct 1999 01:36:50 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: removing garbarge in file system by inode number..."
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Invalid partition table, 1st entry [OFFTOPIC]"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Garzik: "2.3.23 bug: /proc/meminfo"

Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Has this been noticed? /proc/meminfo prints bytes when it should print
> kilobytes, and vice versa:
>
> chief:~> cat /proc/meminfo
> total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
> Mem: 157080 60744 96336 0 832 26204
> Swap: 657981440 12664832 645316608
> MemTotal: 157080 kB
> MemFree: 96336 kB
> MemShared: 0 kB
> Buffers: 832 kB
> Cached: 26204 kB
> HighTotal: 0 kB
> HighFree: 0 kB
> SwapTotal: 657981440 kB
> SwapFree: 645316608 kB
>

Please see my previous note. It's not as simple as that.
There are actually some serious errors inside the swap code
introduced by the HIGHMEM changes there.

--Marcin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: removing garbarge in file system by inode number..."
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Invalid partition table, 1st entry [OFFTOPIC]"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Garzik: "2.3.23 bug: /proc/meminfo"