Re: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions

William Montgomery (william@opinicus.com)
Tue, 7 Dec 1999 09:46:49 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> have you also fixed start_atomic_bh()/end_atomic_bh() in a similar manner?
>
Whoops, I saw that mentioned but did not implement. Will do that now,
could that be the cause? Sounded SMP to me.

> if you are using ktrace it's probably simpler to use a 'dummy' empty
> function which you call only if the bad condition happens. Thus it will
> show up in the ktrace.
>
Neat trick. You guys are amazing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/