Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.UKuu.ORG.UK)
Wed, 8 Dec 1999 13:59:53 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Benno Senoner: "knfsd crashes on SMP pentium box (HX) (SCSI onboard), on RH 6.1, disabling knfsd, possible ?"
Previous message: Jan Kara: "Re: [PATCH] Move in_egroup_p() to sys.c"
In reply to: Jan Kara: "Re: [PATCH] Move in_egroup_p() to sys.c"
Next in thread: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?"
Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?"

> Seems, you meaned multipath. teql is another beast and it is
> exactly, which is reauired in this case. Usage is trivial
> and described in two lines in net/sched/sch_teql.c

Excellent. So we can shoot eql.c for 2.4 ? (please...) and get rid of all
the crufty master/slave stuff it has

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Benno Senoner: "knfsd crashes on SMP pentium box (HX) (SCSI onboard), on RH 6.1, disabling knfsd, possible ?"
Previous message: Jan Kara: "Re: [PATCH] Move in_egroup_p() to sys.c"
In reply to: Jan Kara: "Re: [PATCH] Move in_egroup_p() to sys.c"
Next in thread: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?"
Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?"