Re: Again: EQL - someone's use this thing yet?

Thomas Davis (tadavis@lbl.gov)
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 12:37:55 -0800

kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> > > Consider that "dev->slave" field does not exist more 8)
> > > And restore it with correct name i.e. dev->master. 8)
> > >
> >
> > Huh? If dev->slave goes, then why keep dev->master around? What use
> > does it have then?
>
> BTW I smiled 8)
>

Sorry, was kinda rushed.. right after I sent that e-mail, it was the
'duh!' thing. :-)

> No uses except for bonding. Those two lines in core/dev.c
> will be added to kernel, even if you will not prepare bonding
> to time.
>

I'll look at it for 2.3/2.4.. and I'll send the current bonding for
2.2, if alan wants to include it in his 2.2ac series.

-- 
------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Thomas Davis		| PDSF Project Leader
tadavis@lbl.gov		| 
(510) 486-4524		| "Only a petabyte of data this year?"


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/