Re: ext2 cleanup: ext2_permission() is exactly identical to permission()

Matthias Riese (punk@informatik.uni-bremen.de)
14 Dec 1999 20:37:43 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael T. Babcock: "HDx Drive not ready for command"
Previous message: Alan Curry: "Re: Supporting Macintosh FinderInfo/Resource Fork in Linux NWFS 2.0"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "ext2 cleanup: ext2_permission() is exactly identical to permission()"
Next in thread: Riley Williams: "Re: userfs.txt - prevent people from reinventing the wheel"

Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> writes:

> * This file will contain the Access Control Lists management for the
> * second extended file system.
> */
This is the reason for the code duplication.

Matthias Riese

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael T. Babcock: "HDx Drive not ready for command"
Previous message: Alan Curry: "Re: Supporting Macintosh FinderInfo/Resource Fork in Linux NWFS 2.0"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "ext2 cleanup: ext2_permission() is exactly identical to permission()"
Next in thread: Riley Williams: "Re: userfs.txt - prevent people from reinventing the wheel"