Re: kernel change logs (was Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for 2.3?)

Erez Zadok (ezk@cs.columbia.edu)
Sun, 26 Dec 1999 15:16:51 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: gdth calls scsi_do_cmd() with an uninitialized Scsi_Device"
Previous message: Bernard Wei: "Re: 2.3.35-3+netfilter (ip_nat+iptables) => hard lockup"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Garzik: "kernel change logs (was Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for 2.3?)"

In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.991226124948.29965A-100000@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>, Jeff Garzik writes:
>
[...]
> To sum, documenting changes is a very good idea, notifying specific
> hackers of specific kernel changes is a waste of time [unless they
> are the maintainers of the code being changed, of course].

I agree that notifying individuals doesn't scale. Notifying the list as a
whole, does.

> Jeff

Erez.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sergey Kubushin: "Re: gdth calls scsi_do_cmd() with an uninitialized Scsi_Device"
Previous message: Bernard Wei: "Re: 2.3.35-3+netfilter (ip_nat+iptables) => hard lockup"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Garzik: "kernel change logs (was Re: (reiserfs) Re: RFC: Re: journal ports for 2.3?)"