On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 01:28:12AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I'm told that Linus is somewhat anti debugging systems in the kernel, so it
> > seems like the only route to make using our system and painless as possible
> > would be to have system call entries marked as unimplemented, which would be
> > filled in when you apply our patch.
>
> Why does it need to be a syscall ?
That's a good question. The answer is, it doesn't really -- I'll take a
look at alternatives. Using a /dev/ entry would also alleviate the problem
of updating architecture dependant syscall entries.
Josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 21:00:21 EST