Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

From: Steve VanDevender (stevev@efn.org)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 23:54:56 EST


Albert D. Cahalan writes:
> Digital UNIX (now Tru64, was OSF/1) uses self-modifying code to
> create a generic kernel that can do, if I remember right:
>
> 1. plain
> 2. real-time
> 3. SMP
> 4. real-time SMP
> 5. lock debugging

I have a Digital UNIX box on my desk and admin several Digital UNIX
boxes in my job. It is not too horrible, but I would not hold it up as
a shining example of a system that can do realtime work. It wasn't
until recently that I didn't have to wait through multi-second freezeups
on my box whenever I did large amounts of file I/O. I'm not sure they
really fixed the problem as much as painted it over in more recent
Digital UNIX versions.

I don't think any sane person would want to maintain whatever
self-modifying code tricks that Digital UNIX might use to accomplish
this fabled feat. And did I mention that the Digital UNIX kernel is a
massive 8 megabytes _after_ you prune out most of the optional features?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 07 2000 - 21:00:14 EST