Re: disk-destroyer.c

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jul 22 2000 - 06:19:27 EST


Martin Mares writes:
> I think that a better analogue for the check proposed by Andre is "implement
> sys_rm_rf, but make it check whether the path we are passing to it is not
> /, /bin or /sbin". :-)

I've been looking at the ATA specs recently, and I'm going to do a FAQ-type
thing on this which (hopefully) will put everything in balance. At the
moment, it appears that there is a lot of hype on both sides of the argument
which is not helping us to come to a satisfactory solution.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/aboutme.html / / |
  | +-+-+ --- -+-
  / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
 / | | | --- |
    +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 23 2000 - 21:00:18 EST