>> let me get this straight. are you saying that the "jaz" utility which
>> lets me password-protect write access to my jaz disks should not exist
>> under Linux ? this utility requires the ability to send that are
>> vendor-and-device-specific SCSI commands to the drive.
>
>That doesn't sound like a good implementation, but I doubt these commands
>would be in the same category of command as the flash update ones. I'm
>interested in the dangerous category, not the merely undocumented bits.
so, what do you think would be a good implementation and how do you
propose to distinguish this "category" of command from one to update
the drive ROM ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:20 EST