Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Dec 11 2000 - 17:06:54 EST

Next message: Gary E. Miller: "SMBFS does not compile on test12-pre8"
Previous message: Gérard Roudier: "Re: pdev_enable_device no longer used ?"
In reply to: Gerhard Mack: "Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12"
Next in thread: Rogier Wolff: "Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12"
Reply: Rogier Wolff: "Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> How much of that is due to the fact that the 2.4.0 scheduler interrupts
> processes more often than 2.2.x? Is the better interactivity worth the
> slight drop in performance?

What better interactivity ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gary E. Miller: "SMBFS does not compile on test12-pre8"
Previous message: Gérard Roudier: "Re: pdev_enable_device no longer used ?"
In reply to: Gerhard Mack: "Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12"
Next in thread: Rogier Wolff: "Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12"
Reply: Rogier Wolff: "Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST