Re: Modular versus non-modular ISAPNP

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2001 - 05:03:21 EST

Next message: 陳王展: "Re: About DC-315U scsi driver"
Previous message: Guennadi Liakhovetski: "Re: system call for process information?"
In reply to: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Modular versus non-modular ISAPNP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ion Badulescu wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:02:12 -0500, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
>
> > It is highly recommended to always compile with CONFIG_ISAPNP=y due to
> > these differences. If you grep around for CONFIG_ISAPNP versus
> > CONFIG_ISAPNP_MODULE, you'll see that many drivers are woefully
> > unprepared for isapnp support compiled as a module.
>
> Another entry for the Kernel Janitor's List, perhaps?

Yep.. grep for CONFIG_ISAPNP, look at the code, and evaluate it to make
sure that isapnp works for that drivers regardless of whether
CONFIG_ISAPNP -or- CONFIG_ISAPNP_MODULE is defined.

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | May you have warm words on a cold evening,
Building 1024     | a full mooon on a dark night,
MandrakeSoft      | and a smooth road all the way to your door.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: 陳王展: "Re: About DC-315U scsi driver"
Previous message: Guennadi Liakhovetski: "Re: system call for process information?"
In reply to: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Modular versus non-modular ISAPNP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:00:15 EST