In article <20010423161148.6465.qmail@theseus.mathematik.uni-ulm.de>,
Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de> wrote:
>
>1.) If I'm not mistaken switch_to changes current->flags without
>atomic operations and without any locks and sys_ptrace changes
>child->flags only protected by the big kernel lock.
ptrace only operates on processes that are stopped. So there are no
locking issues - we've synchronized on a much higher level than a
spinlock or semaphore.
That said, it does look like 2.2.x has a real bug, and maybe the ptrace
task stopping sycnhronization is broken..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:12 EST