Re: [PATCH] Single user linux

From: Rick Hohensee (
Date: Wed Apr 25 2001 - 13:34:50 EST wrote:
> for those who didn't read that patch, i #define capable(),
> suser(), and fsuser() to 1. the implication is all users
> will have root capabilities.

How is that not single user?

I have been doing single-user oriented Linux/GNU/unix longer than anyone
I'm aware of with exactly that focus. The one trivial patch I do to the
kernel disgusts the core Linux developers for reasons unrelated to single
user. cLIeNUX boots with 12 vt's logging in already as root. No kernel
molestation. (But stay tuned ;o) Rather than me contributing further to
the topic-skew, please have a browse at

Rick Hohensee
cLIeNUX user 0
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:14 EST