Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?

From: Dan Kegel (dank@kegel.com)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 02:03:17 EST

Next message: Ted Deppner: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Previous message: Hartmann: "Unresolved symbols in 2.4.14-pre7"
Next in thread: Ted Deppner: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Reply: Ted Deppner: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Maybe reply: Dan Kegel: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I get the impression that Alan stress-tests his kernels
more than Linus does before releasing them.

Would it be a Good Thing if Linus decided to make sure
his kernels pass all of Alan's stress tests before
releasing them? (I'm talking e.g. 2.4.14-final, not 2.4.14-preX.)

- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ted Deppner: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Previous message: Hartmann: "Unresolved symbols in 2.4.14-pre7"
Next in thread: Ted Deppner: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Reply: Ted Deppner: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Maybe reply: Dan Kegel: "Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:22 EST