>>>>> On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 11:27:19 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>> I'm no x86 expert, but I have the impression that
>> current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy will be invalid (probably 0)
>> until smp_store_cpu_info() is called in smp_callin(). If so, a
>> console driver using udelay() might not work properly. I suspect
>> there are other issues, but this is just based on looking at the
>> x86 source code for 5 minutes.
Alan> x86_udelay_tsc wont have been set at that point so the main
Alan> timer is still being used.
x86 does use current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy in the non-TSC case, no?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:12 EST