Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck)

From: Alan Cox (
Date: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:45:07 EST

> Alan> x86_udelay_tsc wont have been set at that point so the main
> Alan> timer is still being used.
> x86 does use current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy in the non-TSC case, no?

I believe so. So we should propogate that across earlier, although its
not needed for our current console drivers that I can see
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:13 EST