Re: TCP LAST-ACK state broken in 2.4.17-pre2

From: David S. Miller (
Date: Mon Dec 10 2001 - 19:13:32 EST

   Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:34:47 +0300 (MSK)

   Dave, "official" patch will follow later. I must think about
   some marginal effect in TCP_CLOSE_WAIT and TCP_CLOSING, which can break
   out of switch too. Duh, do specs say something about segments with seqs
   above fin? I do not remember.

A socket in a synchronized state is required to enforce legal sequence
numbers, is it not?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 15 2001 - 21:00:19 EST