On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:
> > 4) distributed repositories
> >
> > 5) ability to exchange changesets by email
>
> These can probably be in version 2...
Actually, I doubt Linus would let us use his repository,
aside from the scalability problems you get with 2000
people trying to use the same repository... ;)
> 1: If I have two changesets applied to a file, and I make a change to
> that file, which changeset is it to be associated with?
> 2: The ability to move a set of changes from one changeset into
> another one. ie: split that damn patch up!
Could be solved with branches, but that's not too clean
either. Splitting up patches is a hard problem ...
> But as a starting point I'd say: changesets as a first-class-concept,
> and lots of integration with tkdiff.
Agreed, changesets, branches and merging are the first
priority.
regards,
Rik
-- <insert bitkeeper endorsement here>http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:01:12 EST