Re: discontiguous memory platforms

From: Daniel Phillips (
Date: Wed May 01 2002 - 12:59:53 EST

On Thursday 02 May 2002 19:56, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Maybe this is a good place to try out a hash table variant of
> > config_nonlinear. It's got to be more efficient than searching all the
> > nodes, don't you think?
> Most of the time there are only a few nodes, I just don't know where and
> how big they are, so I don't think a hash based approach will be a lot
> faster. When I'm going to change this, I'd rather try the dynamic table
> approach.

Which dynamic table approach is that?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST