On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > I wonder if this new method is going to be mandatory (the only one
> > available) or optional. I think there's two different kind of users, for
> > one modules which use an API which provides its own infrastructure for
> > dealing with modules via ->owner, on the other hand things like netfilter
> > (that's probably where you are coming from) where calls into a module,
> > which need protection are really frequent.
>
> Mandatory for interfaces where the function can sleep (or be preempted).
and is not protected by other means (try_inc_mod_count()), I presume.
> > I see that your approach makes frequent calls into the module cheaper, but
> > I'm not totally convinced that the current safe interfaces need to change
> > just to accomodate rare cases like netfilter (there's most likely some
> > more cases like it, but the majority of modules is not).
>
> They're not changing. The current users doing try_inc_mod_count() are
> fine. It's the ones not doing it which are problematic.
Alright, so I'm fine with it ;) (not that makes a difference, but...)
--Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:00:45 EST