Dave Cinege wrote:
>On Wednesday 30 October 2002 2:40, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>
>
>>untar - cpio is better.
>>
>>
>
>CPIO is commonly used and supported by NO ONE. (rpm, whoppee)
>Kernels even come tar'ed. KISS....
>
Irrelevant to this problem. cpio unpack code is smaller, and its format
allows easy and painless concatenation.
>>initrd - 99% moved out of the kernel
>>
>>
>
>Great...you just killed the high level embedded linux market, and
>the ability to play boot games from GRUB. (Network, etc)
>Initrd is a good **OPTION* to have to fall back on...
>
Correct -- and after the initramfs merge, initrd behavior will be
completely unchanged.
>>do_mounts - moved out of the kernel completely
>>
>>
>
>And he's willing to completely purge initrd and do_mounts NOW???
>
Nothing is being purged. Things are being moved to userspace, making
the kernel smaller and less bloated. The kernel's behavior to the end
user is 100% unchanged.
>>initramfs - should be ready for Linus in the next day or so.
>>
>>
>
>Fire away with the 100K+ bloated POS. I'm backwards compatible,
>could easily add 'linked kernel image' support, and only increase
>the current code by 20K.
>
initramfs decreases the kernel size by a load, thank you very much.
Further, any initrd solution is bloated -- you are using a ram disk and
disk-based filesystem, the sum of which equates to ramfs -- with
additional wasted memory for filesystem and ramdisk overhead.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:46 EST