Am Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2002 22:05 schrieb Jeff Garzik:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> > If you want to talk about 2.6 then you should talk about reiser4 not
> > reiserfs v3, and reiser4 is 7.6 times the write performance of ext3
> > for 30 copies of the linux kernel source code using modern IDE drives
> > and modern processors on a dual-CPU box, so I don't think any amount
> > of improved scalability will make ext3 competitive with reiser4 for
> > performance usages.
>
> What is the read performance like?
>From his mentioned paper http://www.namesys.com/v4/fast_reiser4.html, it is
more then doubled compared to ext3 and ReiserFS v3.
To be fair he should explain if it was compared to the latest ext3 (htree)
stuff or not, yet.
It looks truly impressive.
Regards,
Dieter
-- Dieter Nützel Graduate Student, Computer ScienceUniversity of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel at hamburg.de (replace at with @) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 22:00:57 EST