RE: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?

From: Guo, Min (
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 04:31:24 EST

I think it is a good idea....

Guo Min
The content of this email message solely contains my own personal views,
and not those of my employer.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Greg KH
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; PCI_Hot_Plug_Discuss
Subject: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?

Hi, Greg!
After reading the pci_hotplug_core.c, I found there are many codes
that are used to implement the pcihpfs. And how about using sysfs instead
of pcihpfs ? I think it could make the pci_hotplug_core.c smaller. Another
pro is that we will nerver be bothered by the pcihpfs' bug.
How you think about it?

Stanley Wang

Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent Intel

------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. _______________________________________________ Pcihpd-discuss mailing list - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:22 EST