RE: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?

From: Guo, Min (min.guo@intel.com)
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 04:31:24 EST


I think it is a good idea....

Guo Min
The content of this email message solely contains my own personal views,
and not those of my employer.

-----Original Message-----
From: stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com
[mailto:stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Greg KH
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; PCI_Hot_Plug_Discuss
Subject: [Pcihpd-discuss] How about use sysfs instead of pcihpfs?

Hi, Greg!
After reading the pci_hotplug_core.c, I found there are many codes
that are used to implement the pcihpfs. And how about using sysfs instead
of pcihpfs ? I think it could make the pci_hotplug_core.c smaller. Another
pro is that we will nerver be bothered by the pcihpfs' bug.
How you think about it?

Regards,
Stanley Wang

-- 
Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent Intel
Corporation

------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Pcihpd-discuss mailing list Pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcihpd-discuss - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 22:00:22 EST