Re: Andrea VM changes

From: Jörn Engel
Date: Sun Aug 31 2003 - 10:51:10 EST


On Sun, 31 August 2003 08:51:55 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> In the test-and-measurement system I'm developing,
> it turned out the sanest thing to do with OOM conditions
> was to consider them user errors, and to handle them
> by dumping memory usage info about processes and slab caches,
> then halt. It's been very helpful because it turns flaky
> conditions into rock-solid failures. Too bad this drastic
> approach isn't appropriate for general use.

Sound interesting. Can you send a patch for the interested and
unafraid?

Jörn

--
A quarrel is quickly settled when deserted by one party; there is
no battle unless there be two.
-- Seneca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/