Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]
From: Micha Feigin
Date: Fri Mar 26 2004 - 23:34:39 EST
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:37:48AM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Saturday 27 March 2004 02:08 am, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 10:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > You are right, that would be ugly. How is encryption supposed to work,
> > > kernel asks you to type in a key?
> > I haven't thought about the specifics there. Perhaps the plugin prompts
> > for one, or perhaps it takes a lilo parameter?
> The only purpose I can think of for encryption would be so someone can't grab
> the HD and boot it on another PC or read the image directly.
> Unless I'm missing something, that would imply that the key would need to be
> generated from a hardware profile (only creatable by root) somehow to
> restrict its readability to that one system.
Actually it would be very unlikely that grabbing the hard disk would
enable to boot on another machine since you are restoring all the
context/modules etc. The grabber would need an identical system, and
even then I doubt it would work (I don't know how flexible linux and
the hardware are in this respect.
Its more a question of grabbing you entire computer and getting access
to you hard disk, including encrypted partitions. In this case you
would want to request a key from the user and not use a hardware
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> swsusp-devel mailing list
> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/