Re: [ACPI] Re: Linux 2.4.26-rc1 (cmpxchg vs 80386 build)
From: Jamie Lokier
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 10:05:24 EST
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Well, "cmpxchg", "xadd", etc. can be easily emulated with an aid of a
> spinlock. With SMP operation included.
Nope. Len Brown wrote:
> Linux uses this locking mechanism to coordinate shared access
> to hardware registers with embedded controllers,
> which is true also on uniprocessors too.
You can't do that with a spinlock. The embedded controllers would
need to know about the spinlock.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/