Re: route cache DoS testing and softirqs

From: Dipankar Sarma
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 16:59:35 EST

On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:31:09PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:16:11AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> > I don't do any of this. I just have a separate quiescent state counter
> > for softirq RCU. It is incremented for regular quiescent points
> > like cswitch, userland, idle loop as well as at the completion
> > of each softirq handler. call_rcu_bh() uses its own queues.
> > Everything else works like call_rcu().
> the point is that you want this counter to increase in every cpu quick,
> that's why I was thinking at posting the tasklet, if the counter doesn't
> increase from softirq, you fallback in the grace period length of the
> non-bh rcu.
> maybe the softirq load is so high in all cpus that just the additional
> counter will fix it w/o having to post any additional tasklet (I very
> much hope so but especially with irq binding I don't see it happening,
> however with irq binding you may have a call_rcu_bh_cpuset). You should
> give it a try and see if it just works.

Ah, forcing CPUs for quiescent state is my last WMD if I have to use it ever :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at