Re: Iptables-1.2.9/10 compile failure with linux 2.6.7 headers

[Kalin KOZHUHAROV]

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> In article <40D31EA6.5030207@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:56:06 +0900), Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
>
> > Yes, I confirm with linux-2.6.7 and iptables-1.2.9 I got:
> > gcc -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe -Iinclude -Wall -Wunused -I/usr/src/linux/include  -DIPTABLES_VERSION=\"1.2.9\"  -fPIC -o extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o -c extensions/libipt_stealth.c
> > distcc[6323] ERROR: compile on localhost failed
> > In file included from include/libiptc/libiptc.h:6,
> >                 from include/iptables.h:5,
> >                 from extensions/libipt_stealth.c:10:
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:255: error: syntax error before '*' token
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:259: error: syntax error before '}' token
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `DECLARE_MUTEX'
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:339: warning: `DECLARE_MUTEX' declared `static' but never defined
> > make: *** [extensions/libipt_stealth_sh.o] Error 1
> >
> > Last time I recompiled it with 2.6.6 it was ok. The compiled version still seems to work with 2.6.7 for now.
>
>
> Please try this. Thanks
>
> ===== include/linux/netfilter.h 1.9 vs edited =====
> --- 1.9/include/linux/netfilter.h	2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter.h	2004-06-19 02:10:55 +09:00
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #endif
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  
>  /* Responses from hook functions. */
>  #define NF_DROP 0
> ===== include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h 1.3 vs edited =====
> --- 1.3/include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h	2004-06-04 09:52:00 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:08:09 +09:00
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/if_arp.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #endif
> -
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_arp.h>
>  
>  #define ARPT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
> ===== include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h 1.7 vs edited =====
> --- 1.7/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2004-06-07 12:15:03 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:08:39 +09:00
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ip.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #endif
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
>  
>  #define IPT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
> @@ -336,8 +337,8 @@
>  /*
>   *	Main firewall chains definitions and global var's definitions.
>   */
> -static DECLARE_MUTEX(ipt_mutex);
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> +static DECLARE_MUTEX(ipt_mutex);
>  
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  extern void ipt_init(void) __init;
> ===== include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h 1.6 vs edited =====
> --- 1.6/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2004-06-07 12:15:04 +09:00
> +++ edited/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2004-06-19 02:09:29 +09:00
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ipv6.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #endif
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/netfilter_ipv6.h>
>  
>  #define IP6T_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
> @@ -106,7 +107,9 @@
>  	u_int64_t pcnt, bcnt;			/* Packet and byte counters */
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>  static DECLARE_MUTEX(ip6t_mutex);
> +#endif
>  
>  /* Values for "flag" field in struct ip6t_ip6 (general ip6 structure). */
>  #define IP6T_F_PROTO		0x01	/* Set if rule cares about upper 
As far as I understand from this patch, this should be applied to the system headers...
I thought `diff -Nru A B` was the format of choice in LKML...

Anyway, thank you for the patch, but I am not thinking to patch linux-headers, as I like to refer to them as something more or less stable (As opposed to the current kernel).

And just out of curiosity, I did:

include $ patch --dry-run -p2 </tmp/test.diff 
patching file linux/netfilter.h
patching file linux/netfilter_arp/arp_tables.h
patching file linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 337.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h.rej
patching file linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 107.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h.rej

My system has linux-headers-2.4.21 installed.

As I said in my other mail here, I will stick with `make KERNEL_DIR=/usr` for now.

Kalin.

--
||///_ o  *****************************
||//'_/>     WWW: http://ThinRope.net/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/