Re: tun.c patch to fix "smp_processor_id() in preemptible code"

[Herbert Xu]

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:51:17PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> 
> Ok, here is the correct patch.  If this is really just a matter of
> performance, and not required for correctness, disabling preemption is
> broken, right?

No if you're doing this then you should get rid of netif_rx_ni()
altogether.  But before you do that please ask all the people who
call it.
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/