Re: More trouble with i386 EFLAGS and ptrace
From: Daniel Jacobowitz
Date: Tue Mar 08 2005 - 19:19:26 EST
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 01:29:12PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is this semantically different from the patch I posted, i.e. is there
> > any case which one of them covers and not the other?
> Yes, the second case that I described when I said there were two cases!
Calm down, there were already two cases. I reread your message and
couldn't pick out the answer, or I wouldn't have asked.
> To repeat, when the process was doing PTRACE_SINGLESTEP and then
> stops on some other signal rather than because of the single-step trap
> (e.g. single-stepping an instruction that faults), ptrace will show TF set
> in its registers. With my patch, it will show TF clear.
I can reproduce this problem with the patch that Linus committed, so
you should probably update your patch for a current snapshot and nag
him about it.
> > That is an inability to set breakpoints in the vsyscall page. Andrew
> > told me (last May, wow) that he thought this worked in Fedora, but I
> > haven't seen any signs of the code. It would certainly be a Good Thing
> > if it is possible!
> Fedora kernels use a normal mapping (with randomized location) for the
> page, rather than the fixed high address in the vanilla kernel. The
> FIXADDR_USER_START area is globally mapped in a special way not using
> normal vma data structures, and is permanently read-only in all tasks.
> COW via ptrace works normally for Fedora's flavor, but no writing is ever
> possible to the fixmap page.
Blech. I assume that there is no way to map a normal VMA over top of
the fixed page, for a particular process? This makes debugging the
vsyscall DSO a real pain.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/