Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold?
From: Jan De Luyck
Date: Mon Mar 14 2005 - 07:42:07 EST
On Monday 14 March 2005 08:57, Eric Piel wrote:
> Jan De Luyck a écrit :
> > Hello lists,
> > (please cc me from cpufreq list)
> > I've since yesterday started using the ondemand governor. Seems to work
> > fine, tho I can't seem to find a reason why it keeps scaling my processor
> > speed upwards tho the processor use never exceeds 30% (been watching top
> > -d 1).
> > Any hints?
> You can try the three attached patches in the order :
> They are available on the cpufreq list but as it's difficult to access
> it I'm sending them again, all together. These are the last things that
> Venki and I have been working on. It should solve your problem
> (actually, only the last patch, but it depends on the two previous
> patches). Please, let me know if it works.
Okay, now the behaviour of the ondemand governor looks more 'sane'. Thanks, it
looks like a huge improvement :)
Snow and adolescence are the only problems that disappear if you ignore
them long enough.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/