Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers
From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 10:06:41 EST
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, DervishD wrote:
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:17:26 +0200
> From: DervishD <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mariusz Mazur <mmazur@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers
> Hi Mariusz :)
> * Mariusz Mazur <mmazur@xxxxxxxxx> dixit:
> > > I don't know which set of headers will work, and in fact I don't
> > > know if I must follow 'Linux From Scratch' advice and use raw kernel
> > > headers for building glibc and LLH headers for any other thing. I
> > > think I probably will use the LLH headers (including scsi) for
> > > everything since glibc passes the 'make check' doing that... If I
> > > screw my system badly, I have lotsa backups at hand.
> > Like I've said, you're unable to break your system this way.
> I think so...
> > And I don't see any point in LFS suggesting using raw kernel
> > headers to compile glibc
> I don't know their reasons because I haven't read any rationale
> (if any exists at all). Anyway, I've used LLH (including the scsi
http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html seems to have a
bearing on what you are discussing - just FYI.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/