Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'

From: Olaf Hering
Date: Mon May 22 2006 - 03:10:26 EST

On Sat, Aug 06, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200
> > So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather
> > unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations...
> Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed
> up somehow.

I think you are right once again.
(Just the time got a bit out of sync.)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at