Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/19] UML - Remove spinlock wrapper functions

From: Jeff Dike
Date: Fri Aug 04 2006 - 10:16:08 EST

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:00:43PM +0000, alessandro salvatori wrote:
> the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor
> macros to be included from a header file instead of non-static functions in
> the same module as the static irq_lock.

I don't understand. The changes in this patch are -
remove two functions and their declarations
replace calls to those functions with spin_lock_irq_save and
move the spinlock declaration above the spin_(un)lock_irq_save

Which of these are you talking about?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at