Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/19] UML - Remove spinlock wrapper functions
Date: Sat Aug 05 2006 - 07:45:01 EST
On Friday 04 August 2006 15:00, alessandro salvatori wrote:
> the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor
> macros to be included from a header file
Are you talking about spin_lock_irqsave & co? In that case you have maybe
missed that the removed functions were simply wrappers for spin_lock_irqsave.
Those wrappers existed to be used in files which can't include kernel headers
> instead of non-static functions in
> the same module as the static irq_lock.
> Am I missing something?
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/