Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack

From: Jeff Dike
Date: Thu Aug 10 2006 - 00:20:32 EST

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:09:22PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
> > name, rather than "um" to
> Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?

SUBARCH has a different meaning here. For UML, it's the underlying,
host, architecture, not a variant architecture like Voyager.

> Or should we just get together a small fund to send the remaining
> Voyager users proper computers?

Yeah, that's a plan :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at