Re: [PATCH 3/7] SLIM main patch

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Sep 14 2006 - 19:52:28 EST


On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:57:45 -0700
Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> SLIM is an LSM module which provides an enhanced low water-mark
> integrity and high water-mark secrecy mandatory access control
> model.
>

trivial things:


> --- linux-2.6.18/security/slim/slm_main.c 1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.17-working/security/slim/slm_main.c 2006-09-06 11:49:09.000000000 -0700
> @@ -0,0 +1,1378 @@
> +/*
> + * SLIM - Simple Linux Integrity Module
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2005,2006 IBM Corporation
> + * Author: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Kylene Hall <kjhall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the License.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/config.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/security.h>
> +#include <linux/integrity.h>
> +#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> +#include <linux/socket.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/namei.h>
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/shm.h>
> +#include <linux/ipc.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/xattr.h>
> +#include <net/sock.h>
> +
> +#include "slim.h"
> +
> +#define XATTR_NAME "security.slim.level"
> +
> +#define ZERO_STR "0"
> +#define UNTRUSTED_STR "UNTRUSTED"
> +#define USER_STR "USER"
> +#define SYSTEM_STR "SYSTEM"
> +
> +char *slm_iac_str[] = {
> + ZERO_STR,
> + UNTRUSTED_STR,
> + USER_STR,
> + SYSTEM_STR
> +};

Could this be made static?

> +static char *get_token(char *buf_start, char *buf_end, char delimiter,
> + int *token_len)
> +{
> + char *bufp = buf_start;
> + char *token = NULL;
> +
> + while (!token && (bufp < buf_end)) { /* Get start of token */
> + switch (*bufp) {
> + case ' ':
> + case '\n':
> + case '\t':
> + bufp++;
> + break;
> + case '#':
> + while ((*bufp != '\n') && (bufp++ < buf_end)) ;

newline needed here.

> +
> +/*
> + * Determine if a file is opened with write permissions.
> + */
> +static int has_file_wperm(struct slm_file_xattr *cur_level)
> +{
> + int i, j = 0;
> + struct files_struct *files = current->files;
> + unsigned long fd = 0;
> + struct fdtable *fdt;
> + struct file *file;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + if (is_kernel_thread(current))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!files || !cur_level)
> + return 0;
> +
> + spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> + fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + i = j * __NFDBITS;
> + if (i >= fdt->max_fdset || i >= fdt->max_fds)
> + break;
> + fd = fdt->open_fds->fds_bits[j++];
> + while (fd) {
> + if (fd & 1) {
> + file = fdt->fd[i++];
> + if (file)
> + rc = mark_has_file_wperm(file,
> + cur_level);
> + }
> + fd >>= 1;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> + return rc;
> +}

Could we use a more meaningful identifier than `j' here? Perhaps `i' too?


> +#define EXEMPT_STR "EXEMPT"
> +static enum slm_iac_level parse_iac(char *token)
> +{
> + int iac;
> +
> + if (strncmp(token, EXEMPT_STR, strlen(EXEMPT_STR)) == 0)
> + return SLM_IAC_EXEMPT;
> + for (iac = 0; iac < sizeof(slm_iac_str) / sizeof(char *); iac++) {

ARRAY_SIZE()

> + if (strncmp(token, slm_iac_str[iac], strlen(slm_iac_str[iac]))
> + == 0)
> + return iac;
> + }
> + return SLM_IAC_ERROR;
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> +
> +static inline int slm_getprocattr(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + char *name, void *value, size_t size)

It's rather pointless to declare a function inline and to then only refer to
it via a pointer-to-function. Please review all inlinings.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/