Re: Linux 2.6.21

From: Michal Piotrowski
Date: Sun Apr 29 2007 - 17:17:31 EST

On 29/04/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:56:57PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:17:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> > Bugzilla might not be perfect, but it works and it's better than doing
> > it by hand.
> The good thing about the wiki is that it doesn't exclude bugzilla. It's
> just a "regressions list", it doesn't intends to replace bugzilla. If a bug
> doesn't gets fixed for a while, I don't think it's very useful to keep it
> forever in the list like you do in the bugzilla, because I don't think
> it's possible to fix every single bug, and it steals you time to fix bugs
> that you are able to fix.
> It's not great but it's the best clone of you we've found 8)

What exactly is the purpose of the 2.6.21 regressions list in the Wiki?

It's for -stable team.

I didn't saw any 2.6.22-stuff regression yet.



Michal K. K. Piotrowski
Kernel Monkeys
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at