Re: pci-disable-decode-of-io-memory-during-bar-sizing.patch

[Jesse Barnes]

On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:22 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > The per-device flag is fine with me, but I should make something
> > clear:
> >
> > MMCONFIG IS NOT BROKEN!
>
> Trust me, it is.
>
> The particular problem _you_ had with it is only a small small part
> of the bugs we have had.
>
> > What's broken is our PCI probing with certain address space layouts
> > that include MMCONFIG space.
>
> No. You really don't see the big picture. There's been tons of
> problems with MMCONFIG. Like the fact that other devices have their
> IO regions registered on top of it, because the MMCONFIG thing was
> done as a hidden resource. Or the fact that the area claimed was too
> small. Or too large. Or not listed at all.

Yeah, that's definitely a problem, and would be a firmware bug.  There's 
no doubt that firmwares have had trouble with this in the past, but 
given that Vista now relies on this stuff working, it's a lot more 
likely to be reliable in current and future systems.

> The whole thing is a total disaster. I told Intel engineers literally
> *years* ago to not do that idiotic "hidden IO resources that are
> described by firmware that then inevitably gets things wrong", and
> yet what happens? Every single time.

I don't disagree there.  I'm just saying the actual mechanism is fine 
(as illustrated by the numerous non-PC ports of Linux), and this 
particular problem, at least, isn't really specific to how MMCONFIG is 
described or configured by the firmware and OS, it's simply a Linux 
problem.

But like I said, the per-device flag Arjan suggested is fine with me...

Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/