Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] cgroup-memcg fix frequent EBUSY at rmdir

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Tue Jan 13 2009 - 22:02:02 EST


On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:48:43 -0800
Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:35 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { /* subsys asks us to retry later */
> > + mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
> > + cond_resched();
> > + goto retry;
> > + }
>
> This spinning worries me a bit. It might be better to do an
> interruptible sleep until the relevant CSS's refcount goes down to
> zero.

Hmm, add wait_queue to css and wake it up at css_put() ?

like this ?
==
__css_put()
{
if (atomi_dec_return(&css->refcnt) == 1) {
if (notify_on_release(cgrp) {
.....
}
if (someone_waiting_rmdir(css)) {
wake_up_him().
}
}
}
==

> And is there no way that the memory controller can hang on to a
> reference indefinitely, if the cgroup still has some pages charged to
> it?
>
pre_destroy() is for that. Now, If there are still references from "page"
after pre_destroy(), it's bug.
swap-in after pre_destory() may add new refs from pages.
(I implemented reference from "swap" to be memcg internal refcnt not to css.)

Allowing Ctrl-C/alarm() here by signal_pending() will be better, anyway.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/