Re: [PATCH 4/7] tracing/filters: allow user to specify a filter valto be string

From: Li Zefan
Date: Sun Apr 12 2009 - 21:36:53 EST


> Well, IMHO, it would be rather better to just echo 'parent_comm == 123'
> and let it answer depending of which filter_pred_*() callback we have
> for the concerned field.
>
> The culprit is this part in filter_parse():
>
> pred->val = simple_strtoull(val_str, &tmp, 10);
> if (tmp == val_str) {
> pred->str_val = kstrdup(val_str, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pred->str_val)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> The idea would be to not anymore base the check on simple_strtoull to
> guess whether this is a number or a string, making it act subsequently
> to this assumption, which is not the good assumption we must base our
> parsing yet.
>
> Instead, we could let filter_parse only do the job of extracting the tokens
> and then fill the whole pred struct without yet bothering about the type
> of the value.
>
> Thereafter we may defer the real value type checking on filter_add_pred()
> depending on the type of the concerned field:
>
> if (is_string_field()) {
> add it as a string value;
> } else {
> do the check with simple_strtoull
> looks good? Then go to the number size switch....
> ...
> }
>
> You see?
>

Right! Actually I thought about this, then I found one issue, suppose event
foo and event bar both have a field named fb but one is string and one is
integer. Now do this:
# echo 'fb == 123' > events/foo-bar/filter

This will set both filters, but not only the integer one.

But now I think this hardly happen in real-life, and it's not a big issue
if it does happen. So I agree with you on this issue.

Thanks.

> I think it would be a saner basis of parsing.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/