Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for hugetlbfs-related problems on sharedmemory
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed May 27 2009 - 16:19:25 EST
On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:12:27 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The following two patches are required to fix problems reported by
> starlight@xxxxxxxxxxxx The tests cases both involve two processes interacting
> with shared memory segments backed by hugetlbfs.
Both of these address http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13302, yes?
I added that info to the changelogs, to close the loop.
Ingo, I'd propose merging both these together rather than routing one
via the x86 tree, OK?
Question is: when? Are we confident enough to merge it into 2.6.30
now, or should we hold off for 184.108.40.206? I guess we have a week or
more, and if the changes do break something, we can fix that in
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/