Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for hugetlbfs-related problems on sharedmemory

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed May 27 2009 - 19:21:20 EST

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:12:27 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The following two patches are required to fix problems reported by
> > starlight@xxxxxxxxxxxx The tests cases both involve two processes interacting
> > with shared memory segments backed by hugetlbfs.
> Thanks.
> Both of these address
>, yes? I added
> that info to the changelogs, to close the loop.
> Ingo, I'd propose merging both these together rather than routing
> one via the x86 tree, OK?


> Question is: when? Are we confident enough to merge it into
> 2.6.30 now, or should we hold off for I guess we have a
> week or more, and if the changes do break something, we can fix
> that in ;)

With an Acked-by from Hugh i feel pretty confident about it - and as
long as it get into -rc8 i think we should do it in .30.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at