Re: [GIT PULL] x86: unify sys_iopl

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> The x86-64 implementation of iopl was buggy because it never ended up 
> calling set_iopl_mask().  This had no effect on native sys_iopl 
> (because set_iopl_mask is normally no-op on 64-bit), but it ended up 
> never calling the pvop, which caused iopl to have no effect on 64-bit 
> Xen guests.
> 
> The two functions are needlessly different anyway.  This patch just 
> unifies them into a single function which is mostly derived from the 
> 32-bit version.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	J
> 
> The following changes since commit c44c9ec0f38b939b3200436e3aa95c1aa83c41c7:
>   Jeremy Fitzhardinge (1):
>         x86: split NX setup into separate file to limit unstack-protected code
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git bugfix
> 
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge (1):
>       x86: unify sys_iopl
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h |    8 +++-----
>  arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c        |   11 ++---------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Pulled, thanks a lot Jeremy!

It's in tip:x86/paravirt right now. I'm uneasy about pushing this into 
.32 - we had this status quo forever. Peter, Thomas, what do you think?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/