[patch 1/1] devtmpfs: Convert dirlock to a mutex

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Dec 16 2009 - 17:00:42 EST


devtmpfs has a rw_lock dirlock which serializes delete_path and
create_path.

This code was obviously never tested with the usual set of debugging
facilities enabled. In the dirlock held sections the code calls:

- vfs functions which take mutexes
- kmalloc(, GFP_KERNEL)

In both code pathes the might sleep warning triggers and spams dmesg.

Convert the rw_lock to a mutex. There is no reason why this needs to
be a rwlock.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/devtmpfs.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int dev_mount = 1;
static int dev_mount;
#endif

-static rwlock_t dirlock;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(dirlock);

static int __init mount_param(char *str)
{
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int create_path(const char *nodep
{
int err;

- read_lock(&dirlock);
+ mutex_lock(&dirlock);
err = dev_mkdir(nodepath, 0755);
if (err == -ENOENT) {
char *path;
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int create_path(const char *nodep
}
kfree(path);
}
- read_unlock(&dirlock);
+ mutex_unlock(&dirlock);
return err;
}

@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int delete_path(const char *nodep
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;

- write_lock(&dirlock);
+ mutex_lock(&dirlock);
for (;;) {
char *base;

@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int delete_path(const char *nodep
if (err)
break;
}
- write_unlock(&dirlock);
+ mutex_unlock(&dirlock);

kfree(path);
return err;
@@ -352,8 +352,6 @@ int __init devtmpfs_init(void)
int err;
struct vfsmount *mnt;

- rwlock_init(&dirlock);
-
err = register_filesystem(&dev_fs_type);
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "devtmpfs: unable to register devtmpfs "


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/