Re: [RFC PATCH] introduce sys_membarrier(): process-wide memorybarrier (v5)

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 11:07 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra (peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> > We can even create a generic fallback with the following kind of code in
> > the meantime:
> > 
> > static inline void spin_lock_mb(spinlock_t *lock)
> > {
> > 	spin_lock(&lock);
> 
> That would be spin_lock(lock);
> 
> > 	smp_mb();
> > }
> > 
> > static inline void spin_unlock_mb(spinlock_t *lock)
> > {
> > 	smp_mb();
> > 	spin_unlock(&lock);
> 
> and spin_unlock(lock);
> 
> ;-)

Oh, right. I should think of integrating a compiler in my mail client ;)


> 
> > }
> > 
> > How does that sound ?
> 
> You may also need spin_lock_irqsave, et al. variants too.

Yep, or we simply use the local_irq_save/restore separately. That could
be a good idea given that only few specialized sites are affected.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/