Re: [GIT PULL] Ambient Light Sensors subsystem
From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Wed Mar 03 2010 - 12:49:22 EST
Cc'ing Input list and maintainer.
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Dima Zavin wrote:
>> I definitely see the need for what you guys are trying to accomplish.
>> For example, currently, we use an input device for reporting events,
>> and a separate misc device node for control
>> (enable/disable/configure). It's definitely suboptimal, but there
>> currently isn't anything there would let us do things cleanly.
> I have to say, I personally don't see why something like an ambient light
> sensor _isn't_ just an input device.
> What's the difference between a physical "increase screen brightness" key,
> and a "ambient light sensor"? Absolutely none as far as I can tell.
> And for something like an X server, it sounds a lot more natural to just
> have another input device than to have yet abother event reporting
> And quite frankly, the "explanations" I see in this thread for why it
> needs to be a subsystem of its own don't actually explain anything or make
> sense. They seem to boil down to "we just did it this way" without
> actually answering any of the issues brought up.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/