Re: [git pull] drm request 3
From: Adam Jackson
Date: Fri Mar 05 2010 - 11:19:20 EST
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Two wrong choices don't make a right.
> > So unmerge it.
> That's what I told people I can do (I'd just revert that commit).
Read it more strongly: drop nouveau from your tree entirely.
Don't give me any "not a solution" nonsense about that. The problem is
entirely that your expectations for interface stability  in your tree
do not match nouveau's development model and will not for the forseeable
future. Yes, they should htfu and version interfaces like real men.
But they're not going to, so either enforce your rule or don't.
 - apparently ignorable when it's inconvenient, but let's not turn
this into a sysfs argument.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part